Skip to content

The Dispersion of the Peoples

Noah and God’s New Covenant

Noah is now given authority over creation such as was given to Adam at the very beginning (cf. Gen. 1:28).1

This is the first time God gives the command allowing people to eat meat.

God has given the same commandment to Noah that He gave to Adam: to increase and multiply. He has given food as He gave to Adam, except that now He has also allowed meat to be eaten (corresponding to the new conditions of man after the Flood). And just like Adam was given one fasting commandment to keep—not to eat of the tree of the knowledge of good and evil—so Noah is given one command: not to eat blood. The blood belongs to God, the meat to man. That is why, according to Jewish food rules, you have to slaughter the animal with a sharp weapon, and not strangle it so that the blood remains inside. It is symbolical: the blood that comes out is offered to God.2

The commandment regarding blood, says St. John Chrysostom, was given to Noah to act against man’s inclination to murder, to make him meek, even while allowing him to eat meat (which requires killing).3

Blood is, at it were, a symbol of life—and that belongs to God. This particular teaching was still in force in the Acts of the Apostles. In the teachings of the Apostles described in Acts, the one dietary command given to Gentile converts to Christianity was that they not eat strangled animals, from which the blood was not let out (cf. Acts 15:20, 29; 21:25).

Here God makes a covenant with mankind through Noah, just as years later He makes a covenant with Abraham, and still later with Moses.

The rainbow is an appropriate reminder that the rain is not perpetual, since it occurs only when the sun breaks through the clouds. It is very likely that rainbows were not seen before the Flood, since the sun did not shine directly then: there was a cloud layer across the firmament, causing a greenhouse effect over the earth. The rainbow, therefore, became another part of the new conditions of the world after the Flood, when there was no more cloud covering.

This reemphasizes that Noah is like a new Adam. From him come all men after the Flood.

Ham is mentioned as the “father of Canaan” because, according to St. John Chrysostom,4 Ham did not restrain his passion in the Ark but conceived a child when he should have been refraining like his father and brothers. In the Ark, the people were in a state of prayer and fasting. Men abstained from their wives, except for Ham. This sin against the law of prayer and fasting already reveals Ham’s character.

Why did Noah, a righteous man, get drunk? Perhaps, as St. Ephraim suggests, it was because he had not drunk wine for many years; he had been a year in the Ark, and it takes several years to plant the vines and get grapes with which to make wine. Or else, as St. John Chrysostom suggests, wine was actually not even drunk before the Flood. Noah was the first to cultivate vineyards. Therefore, he would not have known the power of wine; he drank it to see what it was like, and it overwhelmed him.5 If this was the case, wine-drinking goes together with meat-eating as one of the new conditions of the post-Flood world.

Verse 22 again calls Ham “the father of Canaan” to remind us of his uncontrolled nature.

What was this sin of Ham? The sin was not so much that he saw his father naked, because then they were not nearly as fastidious about that kind of thing as we are now. Rather, his sin lay in the fact that he saw him in a shameful condition—drunk, all sprawled out—and therefore he mocked his father; he stared at the spectacle and went out and spread tales about his father’s sin.

In English, a “ham” is an actor who makes a big show of himself. In Russian, the word “ham” means something much worse. It refers to someone absolutely shameful, without any manners, politeness or decency (like the Soviets in modern times).

The sin of Ham was the sin of being totally shameless. His brothers, on the contrary, came in with respect, covered up their father, and thus covered up the whole thing before it could be spread about. Thus Ham, the second son, now became the youngest.

But why was Canaan cursed instead of Ham his father? St. John Chrysostom says it was because Ham once received God’s blessing,6 and now the curse must be on his offspring, which hurts him, too. Moreover, Canaan probably also sinned. St. Ephraim suggests that it was actually Canaan, as a small boy, who went in and was the first to see Noah. He went out and told his father, so he himself was partly guilty.7

Now we will see the difference between the three sons of Noah.

Here Noah is making a prophecy, as all the Patriarchs did when they blessed their sons. He prophesies about these three sons from whom the whole population of the earth will come.

Shem is the blessed one, the ancestor of the Semitic tribes, especially the chosen people, the Jews. Japheth is the ancestor of Gentiles, who later accept the word of salvation which Christ revealed first of all to the Jews; they come to dwell in salvation (“the habitations of Shem”) after the coming of Christ and the teaching of the Apostles.8

Canaan and the offspring of Ham are to be the bond servants—but they are also given salvation. The Holy Fathers make a special point that, no matter who your ancestors are, you can still be saved. For example, in Genesis chapter 10 one of Ham’s descendants founded Nineveh, which pleased God by its repentance in the times of the Prophet Jonah. St. John Chrysostom says of this: “Notice how the impiety of one’s ancestors does not entirely put our nature into disorder.”9 It does not make any difference if one’s ancestor is cursed. Any individual or people can repent and seek God’s grace, especially after the coming of Christ. But even before Christ, the Ninevites, even though they were offspring of Canaan who was cursed, still came to repentance.

In the Gospel we read of the Canaanite woman who obtained grace; her daughter was healed through her faith. Christ said to her, “O woman, great is thy faith: be it done unto thee even as thou wilt” (Matt. 15:28). She was a direct offspring ofCanaan, who was cursed. This shows that salvation is given to everyone.

Noah, the second progenitor of the human race, lived slightly longer than Adam.

The Generations of Noah

The tenth chapter goes into the generations of the sons of Noah: Shem, Ham and Japheth. Seventy-two offspring of the three sons of Noah are named, from whom come the different kinds of people. “Each of these nations,” says St. Ephraim, “dwelt in its own distinct place, with its own people, and spoke its own tongue.”10 Some of these kinds of people we can now identify fairly well; others are more difficult to identify.

This is a reference to what will occur after the fall of the Tower of Babel. Out of all the seventy-two basic types of people, there will be a dispersion of humanity throughout all the earth.

“Islands of the Gentiles” refers not necessarily to literal islands, but to the fact that the Gentiles formed separate peoples who were like islands of humanity.

Here are named the offspring of Ham. Many of these are tribes the Hebrews later fought; but they include the Ninevites, who as we have said repented when the Prophet Jonah preached to them.

Shem is the ancestor of Heber. Heber is where we get the name Hebrew.

The islands of people shall now begin to lead their own individual lives.

Of the seventy-two different peoples named, fourteen are of Japheth, thirty-one are of Ham, and twenty-seven are of Shem.

The Tower of Babel

Evidently this was before all the descendants mentioned in chapter 10, when mankind was not yet so dispersed. The sons began to beget their offspring, but apparently mankind was still fairly concentrated in that area. They still had one language and were one in mind. Shinar is the plain of Babylon, of the Tigris and Euphrates.

They already knew the prophecy that man would be scattered over all the face of the earth. They made one more attempt to make a great name for themselves: a great tremendous project, which would prove that we are supreme beings. This is repeated throughout history—the empire of Alexander the Great, the Communist regime, Hitler’s Thousand-Year Reich, etc. The sin behind this is pride.

Such towers are known in Babylonian-Assyrian history, and some still survive. They are called ziggurats: temples with a shrine on top. These are a symbol that, as St. John Chrysostom says, man did not want to stay within the limits that God had given him. He wanted to make himself a god: self-deification. In our modern times, an image of this can be found in our skyscrapers. The idea is to build something higher than anyone has ever built before. You can go to the top, and the climate is totally different from down below. It can be raining down below, and you can be on top above the clouds, in the sunshine.

In chapter 11 we see that, within five hundred years after the Flood, mankind had again become corrupt and proud. It says men were of one tongue, one voice. They all agreed on one thing: that they would become great.

It is like mankind today. There are a few exceptions—people who do not agree with what is going on—but for the most part, men are either agreeing with what is going on or else they are being dragged along with this great project to build Paradise on earth: the Communist society, or a comfortable reign of earthly values; but God is forgotten. Mankind is doing it again. And if man does that, what is God going to do? He promised that He will not destroy the earth like He did before; therefore, He will find various other ways to stop man: plagues, disasters, earthquakes, volcanoes. In this case, He confounds their tongues.

Of course, this does not mean that He did not “see” before; it emphasizes that He was looking very carefully at what was going on. He does not chastise without knowing.

In other words, they have continued to be proud, and have undertaken this tremendous project against God.

When God says here, “Come,” to whom is He speaking? It is the same as in the beginning, when He created man, saying, “Let Us make man.” It is God talking to God in the Holy Trinity.

St. John Chrysostom says about this:

If now, taking advantage of such oneness of ideas and language, men have fallen into such wildness, what might they not do that is worse with the passage of time? … Nothing will be able to restrain their efforts; on the contrary, they will strive to fulfill all their intentions, if they do not immediately endure punishment for their brazen undertakings.11

That is why one expects soon this kind of thing to happen to the world today. Men are more and more inclined towards evil, and to tremendous projects of pride which leave God completely out.

The name of the city was Babylon, which means “Confusion.”
This is the real beginning of the world as we know it: scattered over the face of the earth, each its own nation and language.

These are the offspring of Shem, down to Abraham—the new chosen one, whose descendants were to be a great nation.


Footnotes

  1. St. John Chrysostom, Homilies on Genesis 26.5, 27.4, Tvoreniya 4, pp. 264, 276 [Fathers of the Church vol. 82, pp. 156, 171-172 (26.16, 27.12)].

  2. St. Ephraim the Syrian, Commentary on Genesis 9, Tvoreniya 6, pp. 361-62 [Fathers of the Church vol. 91, p. 143 (6.14.1)].; St. John Chrysostom, Homilies on Genesis 27.4, Tvoreniya 4, p. 276 [Fathers of the Church vol. 82, p. 172 (27.13)].

  3. St. John Chrysostom, Homilies on Genesis 27.5, Tvoreniya 4, pp. 276-78 [Fathers of the Church vol. 82, pp. 172-174 (27.13-17)].

  4. Ibid. 28.4, p. 291 [Fathers of the Church vol. 82, p. 191 (28.11)].

  5. St. John Chrysostom, Homilies on Genesis 29.2, Tvoreniya 4, p. 299 [Fathers of the Church vol. 82, pp. 202-203 (29.6)].

  6. Ibid. 29.6, p. 306 [Fathers of the Church vol. 82, pp. 212-13 (29.21)]. See also St. Ephraim the Syrian, Commentary on Genesis 9, Tvoreniya 6, pp. 364-65 [Fathers of the Church vol. 91, p. 145 (7.3.1-2)].

  7. St. Ephraim the Syrian, Commentary on Genesis 9, Tvoreniya 6, pp. 364-66 [Fathers of the Church vol. 91, p. 145 (7.3.1-3)].

  8. Cf. St. John Chrysostom, Homilies on Genesis 29.7, Tvoreniya 4, pp. 309-10 [Fathers of the Church vol. 82, pp. 216-17 (29.26)]. [See also St. Irenaeus of Lyons, Demonstration of the Apostolic Preaching 22, Pocket Patristics Series. Crestwood, N.Y.: St. Vladimir’s Seminary Press, 1977—., 17, pp. 52-53.]

  9. St. John Chrysostom, Homilies on Genesis 29.8, Tvoreniya 4, p. 311 [Fathers of the Church vol. 82, p. 219 (29.30)].

  10. St. Ephraim the Syrian, Commentary on Genesis 10, Tvoreniya 6, p. 366 [Fathers of the Church vol. 91, p. 146 (8.1.1)].

  11. St. John Chrysostom, Homilies on Genesis 30.4, Tvoreniya 4, p. 318 [Fathers of the Church vol. 82, p. 228 (30.11)].