The Flood
Genesis 6:6-8:22
Here the narrative emphasizes the universality of evil, affecting old and young alike (much as in our own days).
God, of course, does not “repent” that he made man—this is an adaptation to our earthly understanding.1 He simply resolves to punish men and make a new beginning with his righteous man, Noah, who is to become like a new Adam.
Just as the whole of creation was made for man and is to be renewed with him at the end of this world, when there will be a new heaven and a new earth, so too the creation perishes together with the unrighteous men of Noah’s time.
The Fathers emphasize how great was the virtue of Noah to be so perfect in the midst of a corrupt generation, and therefore how possible it is for us to be virtuous even when living in such corrupt times as our own.
In noting that Noah had only three children (while Adam and others of the Patriarchs possibly had hundreds), the Fathers point to the chastity of Noah, who abstained even from the lawful marriage bed.
Here St. John Chrysostom emphasizes how God speaks to Noah face to face about this plan for mankind. He as it were says to Noah: “Men have performed so much evil that their impiety has poured out and covered the whole earth. Therefore I will destroy both them and the earth. Since they themselves have already destroyed themselves beforehand by their iniquities, I will bring complete perdition and exterminate them and the earth, so that the earth might be cleansed and delivered from the defilement of so many sins.”2
Now God commands Noah to make an Ark:
A cubit is supposed to be the distance from the elbow to the end of the hand, roughly eighteen inches. Therefore the Ark, according to this, was approximately 450 feet long, 75 feet wide, and 45 feet high.
This shows that it was a very unusual type of structure, apparently like a big boat—a three-dimensional, rectangular boat—whose sole purpose was to keep Noah and his children and the animals floating through the course of the Flood. The idea is that there is going to be a flood which will obliterate everything, and only those who are left in the Ark will be delivered.
Of course, one can imagine how long it would take for Noah to build the Ark, living in the midst of a corrupt generation. All the people were settled in a fairly close area, so probably the whole world knew about it. One can imagine, too, their response when Noah started building a boat four hundred fifty feet long and saying, “Beware, there’s going to be a big flood.” They probably took their neighbors down, pointed out these “crazy” people, and laughed at them; and their children probably came and threw rocks. The righteous were obeying the will of God, and people were laughing.
So it must have been a very strange command for a righteous man to receive. It shows he was in close contact with God. Like Abraham who was later prepared even to kill his own son because he knew God had spoken to him, so Noah who was righteous, speaking directly to God, obeyed the command he was given. The very building of such an immense structure—which required a good part of that hundred and twenty years these people were given to repent—was to serve as a visible warning to mankind of impending disaster.
God reveals what He is to do with mankind, and establishes a covenant with Noah-a constantly recurring theme throughout sacred history: God makes an agreement with His chosen ones. God does His will on earth not by His fiat, not by simply saying that is the way it has to be, but by finding a righteous man who will obey Him. God arranges that men will do His work on earth.
The sons of Noah were included in the Ark, says St. John Chrysostom, not because they were as virtuous as Noah (although they did avoid the evils of their time) but for the sake of Noah, just as St. Paul’s companions were saved with him when he was shipwrecked (Acts 27:22-24).3
Here Noah is to put food in the Ark: vegetable food, with which the animals also were to be fed. It was to be stored up in great compartments in the Ark.
Again, one can imagine the mockery to which his contemporaries must have subjected him for such a seemingly insane project—and yet Noah obeyed God without question: truly a righteous man for whom the things of God come first and the opinions of man last. This is an inspiring example for us in our own corrupt days.
St. John Chrysostom asks the question how Noah knew the difference between “clean” and “unclean” animals before the law of Moses, when this distinction was made; and he answers: from the wisdom of his own nature implanted by God.4
And why were there to be seven pairs of clean animals, and two pairs of everything else? St. John Chrysostom tells the obvious answer: so that Noah could offer sacrifice when the Flood was over, without destroying any of the pairs. This is indeed what he did (Gen. 8:20). He also had to have animals to eat because, right after the Flood, God gives the command to eat meat.
Perhaps one reason for eating meat was that, after the Flood, when the windows of heaven were opened, apparently a whole new atmospheric condition prevailed. Also, as the Fathers suggest, man had by this time become lower, more fallen.
Modern rationalist critics, of course, have great problems with the whole story of Noah and the Ark. Could there have really been a vessel large enough to hold two of each type of creature (of course, excluding fish, insects and other creatures that might be able to survive on their own), and how could they have been gathered together from all over the world?
Concerning the size of the Ark (which as we have said was roughly 450 feet long, 75 feet wide, and 45 feet high), one modern estimate has found that such a vessel, divided into several floors as the text states, could easily hold two of every kind of animal alive today, with room to spare.
Some rationalists object that the animals on other continents, for example America, could not have come to the Ark. However, if the Flood was really a worldwide catastrophe such as Genesis describes it in the verses that follow, we have no way of knowing what the earth looked like before it—the continents we know were formed by the Flood itself and geological processes that have operated since then. Perhaps there was only one continent then; we don’t know.
How did the animals come? Of course, God sent them. The text does not describe Noah capturing and forcing them on board the Ark; they simply “went in.”5 The Fathers understand this quite simply and realistically. St. Ephraim writes:
On this very day there begin to come from the east elephants, from the south apes and peacocks, other animals assemble from the west, and still others hastened to come from the north. The lions left their thickets, fierce beasts came out of their dens, the deer and wild asses came out of their wildernesses, the animals of the mountains assembled from the mountains. The contemporaries of Noah flocked together to such a new spectacle, but not for repentance, but to enjoy seeing how before their eyes there entered into the Ark lions, and right after them, without fear, the oxen hastened, seeking shelter together with them, how wolves and sheep entered together, falcons and sparrows, eagles and doves.6
In other words, it must have been quite a spectacular event. People looking at it would marvel: what’s going on? The thought did not occur to them that something supernatural was occurring, which might move them to repentance.
Rationalist scholars, of course, would reject this account as full of miracles; but why shouldn’t there be miracles here, as there are in all of God’s dealings with righteous men? Noah is like a second Adam, in whose presence the wild beasts become meek and obedient.
For the same reason, the animals did not attack each other. Just as Adam was a righteous man and therefore the animals were at peace with one another around him, so too with Noah. In Orthodoxy, there is the concept of a prepodobny: a saint who has become like unto the first-created Adam. In the presence of such a righteous person, animals which are natural enemies become in harmony. We see this in numerous Lives of Saints, right up to very recent times. St. Seraphim ofSarov and St. Paul of Obnora in Russia, and St. Herman in America, are a few examples. The Holy Fathers say that is exactly what happened with Noah. The lion would not eat the lamb because Noah was a righteous man. With a righteous man, the laws of nature change.
A big objection of rationalists is the universality of the Flood: Many people say, “There are accounts of Babylonian floods in about 3000B.c. It must have been a local flood in the Babylonian area. There couldn’t have been a flood over the whole earth!” But why not? God made the whole earth; God can destroy the whole earth. Why shouldn’t there be a flood over the whole earth? From the way it is described in the Scripture, it is quite clear that this is what is meant. The Flood described in the next verses, when “all the fountains of the abyss were broken up and the floodgates of heaven were opened” (we discussed this breaking of the firmament and the release ofwater above it in chapter 3), is a cosmic catastrophe of enormous proportions. At the same time, undoubtedly, there was volcanic activity, underground water was coming out, and all kinds of spectacular things were happening, which would account for the fact that there are high mountains now. The Flood was not necessarily over Mount Everest at thirty thousand feet; Mount Everest could have arisen after that. Before the Flood, it could have been that the mountains were fairly low, perhaps some few thousand feet high instead of thirty thousand feet high.
The Scripture describes the waters of the Flood as being twenty-two and a half feet above the highest mountain. If it was only a local flood, how could you have flood waters that high in the area of Babylnia, without having water covering the whole earth? And if it was only a local flood, why didn’t God simply tell Noah to leave the area ahead of time? Why did He have him build this Ark? Noah could have gone away from the Flood area, as Lot fled Sodom.
Furthermore, at the end of the Flood, God promises He will never again allow such a universal catastrophe (Gen. 9:11). Of course, after that there have been many severe local floods, but never a universal flood.
In Roman Catholic books, some modern scholars say, “There must have been other people left in other parts of the world. Noah was just a symbol of this stage of mankind.” But if the Flood was not universal, or at least if there were human survivors of it apart from Noah and his family, there is no point or meaning to this Biblical account of it. The whole point here is the totally new beginning of mankind that occurs with it.
In recent years creation scientists have made fruitful geological investigations that do indeed point to a universal Flood some five thousand or so years ago (see John C. Whitcomb and Henry M. Morris, The Genesis Flood).
During the seven days they are all getting into the Ark, adjusting themselves, finding their quarters, getting the people in charge of feeding set up, and dealing with other practical problems.
St. John Chrysostom describes this as a terrible experience: the smell of all the animals, with no windows looking out. Noah was supposed to take the food which was suitable for himself and feed it to the animals during that time. Undoubtedly it was a time of fasting and prayer and labor. They probably did not eat full meals.
Then the Flood is described:
As we have said, this was not just rain. Everything was coming down from the firmament, and everything was coming up from underneath, reducing the earth to the same state it was on the First Day of Creation—chaos.
Noah was six hundred years old at the time of the Flood; therefore God gave mankind only one hundred years and seven days, not one hundred and twenty years to repent as He had decreed. This is because, as St. John Chrysostom says, men had become unworthy of more time, being unmoved even when seeing the Ark and its animals miraculously assembled in it.9 It was clear enough by then that people were not repenting.
The Flood covered even the highest mountains with fifteen cubits (twenty-two and a half feet) of water. St. John Chrysostom says of this:
Fifteen cubits upwards was the water raised above the mountains. Not without reason does the Scripture reveal this to us, but so that we might know that those who drowned were not only men and cattle and four-footed beasts and reptiles, but also the birds of the heavens and all the beasts and other irrational creatures which dwelt in the mountains.10
Again he says:
Behold how the Scripture once and twice and many times informs us that there occurred a universal destruction, that not a single creature was saved, but all drowned in the water—both men and animals.11
If people were so wicked then, did they all perish spiritually in the Flood? Were all of them condemned eternally for their sins or not?
In the Scriptures we are told specifically about those who were living at the time of Noah. In 1 Peter 3:18-20, the Apostle Peter describes how Christ descended to hades, and whom He saw there: “For Christ also hath once suffered for sins, the just for the unjust, that He might bring us to God, being put to death in the flesh, but quickened by the Spirit: by which also He went and preached unto the spirits in prison (that is, in hades), which sometime were disobedient, when once the long-suffering of God waited in the days of Noah, while the Ark was a preparing, wherein few, that is, eight souls were saved by water.” This “salvation by water,” says St. Peter, is an image of Baptism. The Ark is an image of the Church, of being saved from the wicked world.
This quote of St. Peter says distinctly that Christ went to preach to those who had perished in the time of Noah. Therefore, they had a chance to believe in Christ, although physically they had all died. After death, they had the excuse that Noah was not Christ or God Himself, and now they had the chance to accept Christ. That, however, was up to each individual soul. Undoubtedly, some who had died in the Flood accepted Christ’s preaching in hades, and some did not. Once one’s heart grows hard, one does not accept Christ even though one knows that one should, that this is one’s last chance. Pride gets in the way.
“And God remembered Noah” does not mean that He had forgotten him in the meantime. It means that God kept him in mind to save him. Such expressions are anthropomorphic, so that we can understand.12
The Flood was a hundred and fifty days going up—almost half a year! All that time, Noah was in the Ark without any ventilation or sunshine. The whole sky was covered with darkness. Then the water went down for a hundred and fifty days. Altogether, the earth was covered with water for a year. At that time the land was rising up, tremendous underground reservoirs were being filled, and the whole geography that we now know was being formed.
It came finally to rest on the mountains of Ararat, that is, the region of Ararat. There are several peaks, but there are two main peaks of Ararat. It came to rest in the seventh month, the twenty-seventh day, exactly five months after it had begun to rain.
That is, the Ark had already come to rest upon the high peak. Then the other peaks began to be seen.
This does not mean that it returned; it means that it never did come back.
Thus Noah was in the Ark for one year in all.
Noah sent out birds to scout around. First he sent the raven, which did not return because (according to St. John Chrysostom) it found the corpses of animals and people to eat.13 It was still not safe to go out: the highest elevations were spoiled with these corpses on them.
Then Noah sent the dove. The first time the dove went out, she found no trees or vegetables to eat. The mountains were still covered with slime. The second time the dove found a branch, meaning that the trees were now out of the water and were beginning to grow, but still not enough to support life. The third time the dove did not return because she now found suitable living conditions. Therefore, Noah knew it was now time to come out.
Here we see in Noah the image ofAdam. He is the only one left, together with his family; he is to begin mankind over again. He is given the same command that Adam was given: “Increase and multiply.” He becomes the father ofall living after the Flood.
Notice how Noah—even though he knew it was probably safe to go out since the dove did not come back—waited until God spoke. The whole time he was patiently waiting on God.
So we see that, first of all, Noah offers sacrifice, knowing like Abel in his heart that this is fitting to do in thanksgiving, after having been delivered. He offers the clean animals-both birds and beasts, such as doves and sheep.
Also, we see how God’s mercy is shown. God sees that men will continue to be evil, and that is why He allows meat to be eaten, in accordance with the lower condition of post-Flood humanity. He promises, however, never again to curse the earth (as He did to Adam) or destroy mankind. The normal life of the fallen earth will continue to the end.
In the Flood, everything was killed; but at the end of the world, there will be a renewal of the earth. In fact, people living then will not even die. What we call the “end of the world,” therefore, will not be the same as destroying it. It will be a transfiguration of the whole world.
Footnotes
-
St. Ephraim the Syrian, Commentary on Genesis 6, Tvoreniya 6, pp. 354-55 [Fathers of the Church vol. 91, pp. 137-38 (6.7.1-2)]; St. John Chrysostom, Homilies on Genesis 22.5, Tvoreniya 4, pp. 208-9 [Fathers of the Church vol. 82, pp. 79-80 (22.15)]. [See also Blessed Augustine, City of God 15.25, A Select Library of the Nicene and Post-Nicene Fathers of the Christian Church, P. Schaff et al., eds. Reprint, Grand Rapids, Mich.: Eerdmans, 1952-1956; Reprint, Peabody, Mass.: Hendrickson, 1994, 12, p. 306.] ↩
-
St. John Chrysostom, Homilies on Genesis 24.3, Tvoreniya 4, pp. 229-30 [Fathers of the Church vol. 82, pp. 109-10 (24.7-8)]. ↩
-
Ibid. 24.4, pp. 232-33 [Fathers of the Church vol. 82, pp. 113-14 (24.13)]. ↩
-
Ibid. 24.5, pp. 234-35 [Fathers of the Church vol. 82, pp. 116-17 (24.16)]. ↩
-
The Greeks have the tradition of the semantron, the wooden board that is beaten when calling people to Matins, which is like Noah going out and calling all the animals to the Ark. — Bl. Seraphim ↩
-
St. Ephraim, Commentary on Genesis 7, Tvoreniya 6, pp. 357-58 [Fathers of the Church vol. 91, p. 139 (6.9.2-3)]. ↩
-
According to the Orthodox Christian Calendar, which begins on September 1, we calculate this as the twenty-seventh of October. — Bl. Seraphim ↩
-
I.e., fifteen cubits above the top of the mountains. — Bl. Seraphim ↩
-
St. John Chrysostom, Homilies on Genesis 25.2, Tvoreniya 4, p. 244 [Fathers of the Church vol. 82, pp. 129-31 (25.8-9)]. ↩
-
Ibid. 25.6, p. 251 [Fathers of the Church vol. 82, pp. 139-40 (25.19-20)]. ↩
-
Ibid. 25.6, p. 252 [Fathers of the Church vol. 82, pp. 140-41 (25.20)]. ↩
-
Ibid., 26.3, pp. 259-60 [Fathers of the Church vol. 82, pp. 149-51 (26.8-10)]. [See also Blessed Theodoret, Questions on Genesis 52, LEC 1, p. 111.] ↩
-
St. John Chrysostom, Homilies on Genesis 26.4, Tvoreniya 4, pp. 261-62 [Fathers of the Church vol. 82, pp. 153-54 (26.12)]. ↩